The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer Kindle ´

The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer❴Read❵ ➲ The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer Author Jean-Jacques Glassner – Varanus.us As the first known system of writing, the cuneiform symbols traced in Sumerian clay than six millennia ago were once regarded as a simplistic and clumsy attempt to record in linear form the sounds of of Cuneiform: PDF/EPUB » As the first known system of writing, the cuneiform symbols traced in Sumerian clay than six millennia ago were once regarded as a simplistic and clumsy attempt to record in linear form the sounds of a spoken language More recently, scholars have acknowledged that early Sumerian writing far from being a primitive and flawed mechanism that would be improved by the Phoenicians and Greeks in fact represented a complete written language The Invention PDF \ system, not only meeting the daily needs of economic and government administration, but also providing a new means of understanding the world human history Returning to early Mesopotamian texts that have been little studied or poorly understood, he traces the development of writing from the earliest attempts to the sophisticated system of roughlysigns that comprised the Sumerian repertory by aboutBC Glassner further argues with an occasional nod to Derrida that the invention Invention of Cuneiform: eBook ↠ of writing had a deeper metaphysical significance By bringing the divinely ordained spoken language under human control, Sumerians were able to make invisibility visible, separating themselves from the divine order and creating a new model of power.

The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer Kindle ´
    Have Kindle books have acknowledged that early Sumerian writing far from being a primitive and flawed mechanism that would be improved by the Phoenicians and Greeks in fact represented a complete written language The Invention PDF \ system, not only meeting the daily needs of economic and government administration, but also providing a new means of understanding the world human history Returning to early Mesopotamian texts that have been little studied or poorly understood, he traces the development of writing from the earliest attempts to the sophisticated system of roughlysigns that comprised the Sumerian repertory by aboutBC Glassner further argues with an occasional nod to Derrida that the invention Invention of Cuneiform: eBook ↠ of writing had a deeper metaphysical significance By bringing the divinely ordained spoken language under human control, Sumerians were able to make invisibility visible, separating themselves from the divine order and creating a new model of power."/>
  • Hardcover
  • 266 pages
  • The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer
  • Jean-Jacques Glassner
  • English
  • 07 February 2017
  • 0801873894

    10 thoughts on “The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer Kindle ´

    Have Kindle books have acknowledged that early Sumerian writing far from being a primitive and flawed mechanism that would be improved by the Phoenicians and Greeks in fact represented a complete written language The Invention PDF \ system, not only meeting the daily needs of economic and government administration, but also providing a new means of understanding the world human history Returning to early Mesopotamian texts that have been little studied or poorly understood, he traces the development of writing from the earliest attempts to the sophisticated system of roughlysigns that comprised the Sumerian repertory by aboutBC Glassner further argues with an occasional nod to Derrida that the invention Invention of Cuneiform: eBook ↠ of writing had a deeper metaphysical significance By bringing the divinely ordained spoken language under human control, Sumerians were able to make invisibility visible, separating themselves from the divine order and creating a new model of power."/>
  1. says:

    The only in depth look at the very beginnings of the cuneiform writing system that I have found There is plenty of food for thought here, even though I disagree with several of the author s contentions Early on the book addresses the nature of different systems of communication that use visual signs The practice and principles of pictography are explored as well the development of syllabic values Another chapter establishes the time and era of the invention as Southern Mesopotamia in the 34t The only in depth look at the very beginnings of the cuneiform writing system that I have found There is plenty of food for thought here, even though I disagree with several of the author s contentions Early on the book addresses the nature of different systems of communication that use visual signs The practice and principles of pictography are explored as well the development of syllabic values Another chapter establishes the time and era of the invention as Southern Mesopotamia in the 34th century BCE This covers the preliminaries, Only then do we get into the early signs themselves and the accounting context in which they appear Subsequent chapters deal with how many signs were combined with one another or otherwise differentiated and multiplied The author is always asking the question of how the signs, individually and collectively, convey the information that they do Along the way many individual signs are explored in detail, along with some of the quirks there are several signs that depict a human foot which mean to walk, stand, run etc however a human or animal foot is consistently written with a sign that depicts an donkey s head Even the ingenuity of the author cannot give any explanation for this unexpected anomaly For me, some sections did go on a bit and some parts were not explained very well Part of the problem is intrinsic to the study as you need to develop a vocabulary to analyse the script and its functions As Sumerian writing is so different from modern western scripts this need can only be met by a terminology derived from semantics and semiotics Naturally this can make some discussions quite heavy going And I must admit at times, the Gallic flare and rather flowery language of the author were a little grating


  2. says:

    There s obviously a lot of great information in this, and it gave me ways of thinking about cuneiform which hadn t occurred to me before, but there s something about it that feels a bit disorganised or meandering Is this just my attention span Anyway, I m left with a very joyful sense that we should see cuneiform as its own fully fledged system, rather than as a mere antecedent of writing as we know it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *