Charles S Peirce S Self Corrective Thesis SCT Is Based On The Idea That The Progress In Science Lies In Its Self Corrective Methods Particularly, Peirce S Notion That Scientific Method Consisted Of Four Self Corrective Inferences Abduction, Deduction, Qualitative And Quantitative Induction Is Controversial In The Philosophy And History Of Science Supporters Hold That All The Aspects Of Scientific Inference, Introduced By Peirce, Contribute To Its Self Correction, While Critics Claim That The Justification For The Self Corrective Character Of Scientific Method Is Inadequate Some Critics Argue That The Justification For The Self Corrective Character Of Abduction Is Insufficient, While Others Maintain That From All Four Methods Only Quantitative Induction Is Proved To Be Self Corrective In This Project The Author Explores Peirce S Proposed Scientific Methodology And Discusses It In Comparison With These Objections, So As To Defend The SCT And Distinguish The Context Of Its Validity He Appeals To The Historical Case Of The Chemical Revolution And Discusses Its Interpretations By Different Methodological Views In Order To Evaluate The SCT.
[PDF] ↠ Philosophical Historical Dimensions of Peirces Self-Corrective Thesis Author Nikolaos Bakalis – Varanus.us
- 280 pages
- Philosophical Historical Dimensions of Peirces Self-Corrective Thesis
- Nikolaos Bakalis
- 25 April 2017 Nikolaos Bakalis